This job view page is being replaced by Spyglass soon. Check out the new job view.
PRnckturner: Webhook framework for cloud controller manager
ResultFAILURE
Tests 28 failed / 70 succeeded
Started2022-08-09 11:11
Elapsed2h1m
Revision
Builderffe986ef-17d3-11ed-9df9-ea9f6267f2a1
Refs master:f0bd02ca
108838:131f106e
infra-commit6af79a3da
job-versionv1.25.0-beta.0.34+229f028b059791
kubetest-versionv20220804-4fa19ea91a
repok8s.io/kubernetes
repo-commit229f028b059791231e8f6cca69c6974169a662b3
repos{u'k8s.io/kubernetes': u'master:f0bd02ca5e1773396288149f4faab25d2f9c6dfe,108838:131f106edf3c48114083068d4e99035ea2a8ba6e'}
revisionv1.25.0-beta.0.34+229f028b059791

Test Failures


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should deny crd creation [Conformance] 39s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-api\-machinery\]\sAdmissionWebhook\s\[Privileged\:ClusterAdmin\]\sshould\sdeny\scrd\screation\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:2041
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.registerValidatingWebhookForCRD(0xc000b242c0, {0xc000af6530, 0xc}, 0xc005377090, 0x2e83cc0?)
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:2041 +0x7b1
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.glob..func27.12()
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:308 +0x45
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should honor timeout [Conformance] 1m58s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-api\-machinery\]\sAdmissionWebhook\s\[Privileged\:ClusterAdmin\]\sshould\shonor\stimeout\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:853
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.deployWebhookAndService(0xc000b242c0, {0xc004266000, 0x2c}, 0xc003fd0140, 0x20fb, 0x20fc)
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:853 +0x141a
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.glob..func27.1()
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:101 +0x226
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] should mutate custom resource with different stored version [Conformance] 11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-api\-machinery\]\sAdmissionWebhook\s\[Privileged\:ClusterAdmin\]\sshould\smutate\scustom\sresource\swith\sdifferent\sstored\sversion\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:1947
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.testMultiVersionCustomResourceWebhook(0xc000b242c0, 0xc002dd1920)
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:1947 +0x525
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery.glob..func27.13()
	test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:330 +0xc6
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-apps] StatefulSet Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should have a working scale subresource [Conformance] 10m10s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-apps\]\sStatefulSet\sBasic\sStatefulSet\sfunctionality\s\[StatefulSetBasic\]\sshould\shave\sa\sworking\sscale\ssubresource\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/statefulset/wait.go:80
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/statefulset.WaitForRunningAndReady(...)
	test/e2e/framework/statefulset/wait.go:80
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apps.glob..func10.2.13()
	test/e2e/apps/statefulset.go:852 +0x210
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-apps] StatefulSet Basic StatefulSet functionality [StatefulSetBasic] should list, patch and delete a collection of StatefulSets [Conformance] 10m40s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-apps\]\sStatefulSet\sBasic\sStatefulSet\sfunctionality\s\[StatefulSetBasic\]\sshould\slist\,\spatch\sand\sdelete\sa\scollection\sof\sStatefulSets\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/statefulset/wait.go:80
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/statefulset.WaitForRunningAndReady(...)
	test/e2e/framework/statefulset/wait.go:80
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apps.glob..func10.2.14()
	test/e2e/apps/statefulset.go:950 +0xbff
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-network] DNS should provide DNS for the cluster [Conformance] 11m11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sDNS\sshould\sprovide\sDNS\sfor\sthe\scluster\s\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/network/dns_common.go:455
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.assertFilesContain({0xc001494ec0?, 0x4?, 0x4?}, {0x7342257?, 0x7?}, 0xc000c79800?, {0x7c7a8b8?, 0xc000776480?}, 0x0?, {0x0, ...})
	test/e2e/network/dns_common.go:455 +0x1dc
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.assertFilesExist(...)
	test/e2e/network/dns_common.go:449
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.validateDNSResults(0xc000b734a0, 0xc000c79800, {0xc001494ec0, 0x4, 0x4})
	test/e2e/network/dns_common.go:512 +0x452
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func2.1()
	test/e2e/network/dns.go:66 +0x41e
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-network] HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol [LinuxOnly] [Conformance] 14s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sHostPort\svalidates\sthat\sthere\sis\sno\sconflict\sbetween\spods\swith\ssame\shostPort\sbut\sdifferent\shostIP\sand\sprotocol\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go:596

				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-network] Networking Granular Checks: Pods should function for node-pod communication: http [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m0s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sNetworking\sGranular\sChecks\:\sPods\sshould\sfunction\sfor\snode\-pod\scommunication\:\shttp\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/network/utils.go:864
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/network.(*NetworkingTestConfig).createNetProxyPods(0xc0034b9180, {0x7347e41, 0x9}, 0xc002ffda70)
	test/e2e/framework/network/utils.go:864 +0x1d0
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/network.(*NetworkingTestConfig).setupCore(0xc0034b9180, 0x47?)
	test/e2e/framework/network/utils.go:761 +0x55
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/network.NewCoreNetworkingTestConfig(0xc00083c000, 0x1)
	test/e2e/framework/network/utils.go:142 +0xfb
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/network.glob..func1.1.4()
	test/e2e/common/network/networking.go:106 +0x34
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-network] Services should be able to change the type from ClusterIP to ExternalName [Conformance] 6.25s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sServices\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\schange\sthe\stype\sfrom\sClusterIP\sto\sExternalName\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/network/service.go:3929
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.createAndGetExternalServiceFQDN({0x7c7a8b8, 0xc005109800}, {0xc00418a9e0, 0xd}, {0x734e9ac, 0xb})
	test/e2e/network/service.go:3929 +0x117
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func25.17()
	test/e2e/network/service.go:1497 +0x1b0
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-network] Services should have session affinity work for NodePort service [LinuxOnly] [Conformance] 6.25s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sServices\sshould\shave\ssession\saffinity\swork\sfor\sNodePort\sservice\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/network/service.go:3828
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.execAffinityTestForNonLBServiceWithOptionalTransition(0x736b6ed?, {0x7c7a8b8, 0xc00502e780}, 0xc00183f900, 0x0)
	test/e2e/network/service.go:3828 +0x1d0
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.execAffinityTestForNonLBService(...)
	test/e2e/network/service.go:3813
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func25.28()
	test/e2e/network/service.go:2207 +0x8d
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Container Lifecycle Hook when create a pod with lifecycle hook should execute poststart exec hook properly [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sContainer\sLifecycle\sHook\swhen\screate\sa\spod\swith\slifecycle\shook\sshould\sexecute\spoststart\sexec\shook\sproperly\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:107
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*PodClient).CreateSync(0xc002f07668, 0x22?)
	test/e2e/framework/pods.go:107 +0x94
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.2(0xc000c62400)
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:74 +0x73
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.3()
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:107 +0x335
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Container Lifecycle Hook when create a pod with lifecycle hook should execute prestop exec hook properly [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 44s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sContainer\sLifecycle\sHook\swhen\screate\sa\spod\swith\slifecycle\shook\sshould\sexecute\sprestop\sexec\shook\sproperly\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:89
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.2(0xc00157d400)
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:89 +0x326
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.4()
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:123 +0x336
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Container Lifecycle Hook when create a pod with lifecycle hook should execute prestop http hook properly [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 46s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sContainer\sLifecycle\sHook\swhen\screate\sa\spod\swith\slifecycle\shook\sshould\sexecute\sprestop\shttp\shook\sproperly\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:89
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.2(0xc001c53000)
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:89 +0x326
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func12.1.6()
	test/e2e/common/node/lifecycle_hook.go:167 +0x62c
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Ephemeral Containers [NodeConformance] will start an ephemeral container in an existing pod [Conformance] 1m6s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sEphemeral\sContainers\s\[NodeConformance\]\swill\sstart\san\sephemeral\scontainer\sin\san\sexisting\spod\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:173
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*PodClient).AddEphemeralContainerSync(0xc00106cf90, 0xc00169c000, 0xc001845e30, 0x3?)
	test/e2e/framework/pods.go:173 +0x65c
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func6.2()
	test/e2e/common/node/ephemeral_containers.go:72 +0x528
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] InitContainer [NodeConformance] should not start app containers and fail the pod if init containers fail on a RestartNever pod [Conformance] 5m0s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sInitContainer\s\[NodeConformance\]\sshould\snot\sstart\sapp\scontainers\sand\sfail\sthe\spod\sif\sinit\scontainers\sfail\son\sa\sRestartNever\spod\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/init_container.go:553
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func8.5()
	test/e2e/common/node/init_container.go:553 +0xaf2
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] KubeletManagedEtcHosts should test kubelet managed /etc/hosts file [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6.19s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sKubeletManagedEtcHosts\sshould\stest\skubelet\smanaged\s\/etc\/hosts\sfile\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).ExecCommandInContainer(0xc0049e1900?, {0x73453e9, 0x8}, {0x7347364, 0x9}, {0xc002b10b20?, 0xa93a380?, 0x64e4c20?})
	test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105 +0x1af
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.(*KubeletManagedHostConfig).getFileContents(...)
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:151
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.assertManagedStatus(0xc0006c5fb0, {0x73453e9, 0x8}, 0x1, {0x7347364, 0x9})
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:116 +0x19b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.(*KubeletManagedHostConfig).verifyEtcHosts(0x736406a?)
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:74 +0x5d
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func10.1()
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:68 +0x65
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] PreStop should call prestop when killing a pod [Conformance] 1m11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sPreStop\sshould\scall\sprestop\swhen\skilling\sa\spod\s\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/node/pre_stop.go:152
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/node.testPreStop({0x7c7a8b8, 0xc0009d3e00}, {0xc003f92170, 0xc})
	test/e2e/node/pre_stop.go:152 +0x1217
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/node.glob..func11.2()
	test/e2e/node/pre_stop.go:169 +0x31
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Probing container should *not* be restarted with a exec "cat /tmp/health" liveness probe [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 4m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sProbing\scontainer\sshould\s\*not\*\sbe\srestarted\swith\sa\sexec\s\"cat\s\/tmp\/health\"\sliveness\sprobe\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:157
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func2.5()
	test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:157 +0x165
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-node] Probing container with readiness probe that fails should never be ready and never restart [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 1m0s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sProbing\scontainer\swith\sreadiness\sprobe\sthat\sfails\sshould\snever\sbe\sready\sand\snever\srestart\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:123
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func2.3()
	test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:123 +0x3b2
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] ConfigMap optional updates should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 4m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\soptional\supdates\sshould\sbe\sreflected\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:412
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func1.12()
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:412 +0x20f9
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] ConfigMap updates should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m0s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\supdates\sshould\sbe\sreflected\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:107
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*PodClient).CreateSync(0xc000e78480, 0x10?)
	test/e2e/framework/pods.go:107 +0x94
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func1.10()
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:151 +0x4b3
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected configMap updates should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 4m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sconfigMap\supdates\sshould\sbe\sreflected\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:165
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func7.10()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:165 +0x98d
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected downwardAPI should update annotations on modification [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 2m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sdownwardAPI\sshould\supdate\sannotations\son\smodification\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/storage/projected_downwardapi.go:184
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func8.8()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_downwardapi.go:184 +0x35a
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6.19s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\smount\sin\sa\svolume\sregardless\sof\sa\sdifferent\ssecret\sexisting\swith\ssame\sname\sin\sdifferent\snamespace\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:770
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x739b61b?, {0x7360067?, 0xc0054f5e30?}, 0xc00063e400, 0x0, {0xc0054f5df0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:770 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doSecretE2EWithoutMapping(0xc0008dbe40, 0x0, {0xc002b965a0, 0x30}, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:537 +0x9de
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func10.6()
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:116 +0x5c5
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] Subpath Atomic writer volumes should support subpaths with downward pod [Conformance] 6.13s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSubpath\sAtomic\swriter\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\ssubpaths\swith\sdownward\spod\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:770
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0xc001589000?, {0x7384375?, 0x0?}, 0xc001589000, 0x0, {0xc001113e18, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:770 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites.TestBasicSubpathFile(0xc00141a420?, {0xc005baa450?, 0x21?}, 0xc001589000?, {0x7350336?, 0xc001113ea0?})
	test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:490 +0x12a
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites.TestBasicSubpath(...)
	test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:481
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage.glob..func29.1.5()
	test/e2e/storage/subpath.go:98 +0x17d
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [It] [sig-storage] Subpath Atomic writer volumes should support subpaths with secret pod [Conformance] 8.14s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSubpath\sAtomic\swriter\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\ssubpaths\swith\ssecret\spod\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:770
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0xc001c52400?, {0x7384375?, 0x0?}, 0xc001c52400, 0x0, {0xc0031ede28, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:770 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites.TestBasicSubpathFile(0xc00141a420?, {0x735350a?, 0xc?}, 0xc001c52400?, {0x7350336?, 0xc0031edea0?})
	test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:490 +0x12a
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites.TestBasicSubpath(...)
	test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:481
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage.glob..func29.1.2()
	test/e2e/storage/subpath.go:62 +0xd4